Specifications

TEST REPORT
FEBRUARY 2006
Virtualized Exchange workload performance comparison of end-to-end
solutions with iSCSI storage connections: Dell PowerEdge 2950 with Dell
EqualLogic PS5000 vs. HP ProLiant DL385 with HP StorageWorks EVA 4400
TEST REPORT
OCTOBER 2008
KEY FINDINGS
z The Dell PowerEdge 2950 server and Dell
EqualLogic PS5000 storage array delivered
21.4 percent more virtualized Exchange
workload performance than the HP ProLiant
DL385 server and HP StorageWorks EVA
4400 storage array (see Figure 1).
1
z The Dell PowerEdge 2950 server and Dell
EqualLogic PS5000 storage array delivered
18.2 percent more virtualized Exchange
workload performance/watt than the HP
ProLiant DL385 server and HP
StorageWorks EVA 4400 storage array (see
Figure 2).
2
Executive summary
Dell Inc. (Dell) commissioned Principled Technologies
(PT) to compare the virtualized Exchange 2007 workload
performance of two server-and-storage solutions with
iSCSI connections:
Dell PowerEdge 2950 server and Dell EqualLogic
PS5000 storage array
HP ProLiant DL385 server and HP StorageWorks
EVA 4400 storage array
Both servers contained two processors and 32 GB of
RAM, and both connected to their storage with iSCSI.
Each server ran multiple Exchange 2007 workloads, one
per virtual machine (VM). Each VM’s workload used the
Microsoft Exchange Load Generator. By combining
multiple virtual machines with a disk-intensive workload,
the test placed a heavy load on both the server and the
storage. Thus, it measured the performance of the overall solution--server and storage.
Figure 1 compares the peak number of virtual machines running a Microsoft Exchange 2007 workload that each
solution ran with acceptable performance (a response time of a second or less on all tasks). The Dell solution
achieved 17 simultaneous virtual machines (VMs), while the HP solution delivered only 14 such VMs. Thus, the
Dell solution had a 21.4 percent performance advantage over the HP solution. (The Workload section explains in
more detail the virtualized
Exchange 2007 workload.)
Figure 2 illustrates the
performance/watt for each of
the two solutions. In this chart,
we normalized the results for
each workload to those of the
solution with lower
performance/watt. We
compute performance/watt by
dividing the benchmark’s
score by the average power
consumption, in watts, of the
solution during the period the
benchmark was delivering
peak performance.
As Figure 2 shows, the Dell
solution delivered 18.2 percent
more performance/watt than
the HP solution.
1
Principled Technologies, Inc., Virtualized Exchange workload performance comparison of end-to-end solutions with iSCSI storage
connections: Dell PowerEdge 2950 with Dell EqualLogic PS5000 vs. HP ProLiant DL385 with HP StorageWorks EVA 4400, October
2008.
2
Ibid.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Number of virtual machines
-
Virtualized Exchange 2007 workload results
HP ProLiant DL385
server and HP
StorageWorks EVA
4400 storage array
Dell PowerEdge 2950
server and Dell
EqualLogic PS5000
storage array
Figure 1: Virtualized Exchange 2007 workload performance results for the two server-and-
storage solutions we tested.

Summary of content (14 pages)