User guide

Table Of Contents
The percent of Guardian RT readings in the previous graph are presented in the following table according
to the percentage of points falling within each zone (A-E). Results are further broken down (stratified)
according to the range of glucose concentrations.
Glucose
Range
(mg/dl)
Number and
(%) of Data
Points
Evaluated
A + B A B C D E
40-80 356 (9) 271 (76.1) 214 (60.1) 57 (16.0) 2 (0.6) 80 (22.5) 3 (0.8)
81-120 769 (20) 768 (99.9) 463 (60.2) 305 (39.7) 1 (0.1)
N/A
a
N/A
121-240 2362 (60) 2352 (99.6) 1476 (62.5) 876 (37.1) 4 (0.2) N/A 6 (0.2)
>240 454 (11) 394 (86.8) 277 (61.0) 117 (25.8) N/A 59 (13.0) 1 (0.2)
Overall 3941 (100) 3785 (96.0) 2430 (61.7) 1355 (34.4) 7 (0.2) 139 (3.5) 10 (0.2)
a. N/A means that the Clarke Error Grid does not consider the possibility of these zones in that concentration range.
Precision of Guardian RT readings
This study was also designed to look at the reproducibility of two sensors worn simultaneously at different
locations on the body. Precision was estimated by comparing the glucose readings from the two Guardian
RT systems. In this study 11,475 paired sensor Guardian RT values were obtained. On average, they were
different by 17.2%. The following figure is an example of how data was paired in this study. In the
graph there are two tracings of Guardian RT values. Each tracing comes from a different Guardian RT unit
worn by one subject during a one-day period.
Appendix A138