User Manual

CABLE THEORY
Page 9
COPYRIGHT © 2006 THE QUEST GROUP, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
is not much penalty. On the other hand, inductance is always a problem-a constantly accumulating
problem. Capacitance and inductance are not the only important variables in cable design. However,
it is productive to create cables whose capacitance doesn’t “go over the cliff” while also designing for
minimum inductance.
One theory of cable design holds that the characteristic impedance of a cable should match the imped-
ance of the loudspeaker (When an antenna cable is referred to as 75 or 300, that is the characteristic
impedance). Impedance matching is a valid concept which only applies when the impedance of the
source, the cable and the load are all the same, and when the cable is longer than the wavelengths
of the frequencies to be transmitted. Ampliers do not have 4 or 8 ohm output impedances, in fact
amplier designers try to have as low an output impedance as possible. Speakers are all different and
never have the same impedance at all audio frequencies. Since characteristic impedance equals the
square root of the ratio of inductance to capacitance, very high (over the cliff) capacitance is a neces-
sary corollary of a low characteristic impedance. Such high capacitance can severely affect amplier
performance and should be avoided.
Some of the rst generation of specialty speaker cables had a characteristic impedance of about 8.
These very high capacitance cables sounded better or worse because of their ability or inability to deal
with the problems discussed earlier. However, many of these cables were accused of being extremely
bright and irritating. It was not the cables which were so bright, it was the sound of the amplier,which
had been encouraged into instability by the cables.
Such false conclusions could be avoided if products were judged on their merit and then methodically
analyzed. Consumers, store buyers, and reviewers each need to discover what sounds good. Unfortu-
nately the desire to understand “why” can cause more confusion than insight if not pursued empirically
as well as theoretically.
The Challenge Of Interconnect (Low-Current) Cable Design
If you haven’t read the previous discussion of problems in speaker
cables, then please read that rst. The following is meant to build
on that foundation. The same problems exist in both high-current
(speaker) and low-current (interconnect) applications. However, the
hierarchy among these problems differs.
In low-current cables; skin-effect, electrical interaction, magnetic in-
teraction and conductor quality are still primary problems. The nega-
tive sonic effect of internal mechanical modulation due to magnetic
elds is greatly reduced.
The electrical behavior of the dielectric (insulating material) is much
more important in low level cables. Dielectric involvement (the way
in which a particular material absorbs and releases energy), has a
profound effect on an audio or video signal. Dielectric constant, the most often quoted specication for
insulating material, is actually not very helpful in understanding the audible attributes of different materi-
als. The coefcient of absorption value is more relevant, and the dissipation factor and the velocity of
propagation are even more useful.
The problem is that any insulating material next to a conductor acts like a capacitor which stores and