User manual

US 8,510,424 B2
Page 4
2T-HA10F-CD 3.6 KVA Uninterruptible Power System: Operating
information, Digital Equipment Corp., Order No. EK-HA10F-OP.
B01, pp. 1-1 to 5-4, Aug. 1992*
A Software managing Clustered Multi-Vender Uninteruptible Power
Supply on Network, IBM Tech. Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 42, No. 419,
Mar. 1, 1999*
Touch-Pad Code-Actuated Electrical Outlet, IBM Tech. Disclosure
Bulletin, vol. 33, No. 1A, 143-147, Jun. 1, 1990.*
UPS MIB, Merling GeriniDAM Division, www.exploits.org/nut/
library/protocols/snmp/mgeups.mib, pp. 1-41, Oct. 11, 1995.*
Liebert SiteNet SNMP MIBs, The Latest MIBs Available for Down
load, http://www.liebert.com/products/english/products/software/
snmp/intro. asp?ID:921, pp. 1-2, Jul. 2, 2003*
Newman, J ., Enterprise Power Protection: Don’t Get UPSet; Get the
Right UPS Instead, Network Computing, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 1- 10, Feb.
15, 1996*
“Expert Witness Report of Douglas Bors, PE” Server Technology,
Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3 :06-CV
00698-LRH-VPC, 87 pp. (May 27, 2011).
“Expert Witness Report of Dr. Mark Horenstein Regarding Invalidity
of STI’s Patents” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Con
version Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 137 pp.
(May 27, 2011).
“Expert Report of KC Mares” Server Technology, Inc. v. American
Power Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH
VPC, 204 pp. (May 27, 2011).
“Rebuttal Expert Witness Report of Douglas Bors, PE” Server Tech
nology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation, Case No.
3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 19 pp. (Jun. 29, 2011).
“Expert Report of B. Michael Aucoin, D. Engr., PE, PMP Consoli
dated Rebuttal of APC’s Expert Invalidity Reports” Server Technol
ogy, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation, Case No.
3 :06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 152 pp. (Jun. 29, 2011).
“Expert Report of KC Mares (In Rebuttal to APC’s Invalidity
Reports)” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion
Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 33 pp. (Jun. 29,
201 1).
“American Power Conversion Motion for Summary Judgment”
Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation;
Case No. 3:06-cv-00698-LRH-VPC; 4 pp.; Aug. 30, 2011.
“APC’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion for Summary
Judgment and Exhibits” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power
Conversion Corporation; Case No. 3:06-cv-00698-LRH-VPC; 75
pp.; Aug. 30, 2011.
“STI’s Response to APC’s Motion for Summary Judgment” Server
Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation; Case
No. 3:06-cv-00698-LRH-VPC; 85 pp.; Sep. 26, 2011.
“APC’s Reply in Support of Summary Judgment and Exhibits”
Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation;
Case No. 3:06-cv-00698-LRH-VPC; 90 pp.; Oct. 14, 2011.
“Patent Owner’s Revised Response to Non-Final Of?ce Action, and
Exhibits,” Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; 615 pp.; Jun. 20,
201 1.
“Requestor’s Revised Comments on Of?ce Action of Jan. 15, 2011
and Patent Owner’s Revised Response, and Exhibits,” Reexamina
tion Control No. 95/001,485; 380 pp.; Sep. 29, 2011.
Betty Yuan, “Remote Control Equals Power,” Teleconnect, Feb.
2000, pp. 60-66, New York, NY USA.
Of?ce Action dated Jun. 10, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/125,963;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Dec. 22, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/126,092;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Oct. 13, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/459,011;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Oct. 13, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/548,187;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Jun. 8, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/738,417;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Nov. 28, 2011; US. Appl. No. 12/853,193;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Feb. 1, 2011; US. Appl. No. 12/763,137;
USPTO.
* cited by examiner