User Manual

04
TELESCOPE BASICS
T
E
L
E
S
C
O
P
E
B
A
S
I
C
S
MOUNT AND TELESCOPE TYPES
Altazimuth vs. Equatorial (cont.)
These type mounts are good for terrestrial observing and for scanning
the sky at lower power but are not advised for deep sky photography.
Both Altazimuth and Equatorial mounts can track the stars sufficiently
for visual use, however, only equatorials can be used for long exposure
astrophotography. Since Altazimuth mounts are not aligned with the
Earth’s axis, they must use both axes to track an object. With Altazimuth
mounts you will be able to accurately track an object centered in the
field of view, however over time all the other stars in the field will
appear to rotate around the center of the field. This is hardly noticeable
in an eyepiece, but is obvious on film.
Altazimuth Advantages
• Easy to setup and use
• Least expensive type of mount
• Ideal for terrestrial observing
Altazimuth Disadvantages
• Cannot be used for long
exposure photography
• Non-computerized models cannot
track stars and planets
On an Equatorial mounting, the two axes are perpendicular to each
other as they are on an Altazimuth mount. But on an Equatorial
mounting, the left-to-right axis has been tilted so that it is parallel to the
Earth’s axis instead of at the horizon. On an Equatorial mount, only the
axis that is parallel to the Earth’s axis, needs to be rotated. On an
Altazimuth mount, BOTH axes must be moved.
If you would like to do long exposure photography, the telescope must
be mounted on an equatorial mount. Some Celestron telescopes that
are on Altazimuth mountings can be tilted up (with the use of an
equatorial wedge) to orient the azimuth axis parallel to the Earth’s axis.
Equatorial Advantages
• Best for long exposure photography
• Easy to use visually because only one
axis movement compensates for
Earth’s rotation
• Setting circles on non-computerized
models help locate astronomical
objects
Equatorial Disadvantages
• Set-up is more extensive because of polar alignment requirements
• Not suitable for terrestrial use
Do you want a GoTo computerized telescope?
Many Celestron telescopes are computerized “GoTo” telescopes. GoTo
capability is very useful for the novice who needs assistance in finding
objects in the night sky. Since there is a large database of celestial
objects, it is unnecessary to refer to star charts to identify objects.
Once the telescope is properly aligned and an object is selected, the
telescope will automatically “go to” the object. GoTo equipped Celestron
telescopes include both altazimuth and equatorial models. Even without
GoTo, many Celestron equatorial scopes have manual setting circles
that allow you to find objects in the sky with the help of a good
star map.
There are a number of factors to consider when selecting a particular telescope.
These factors will usually depend on your individual requirements including cost,
portability, versatility, usability and appearance. You should also consider how you
plan to use the instrument both now and in the future. Most important, consider
your budget and portability requirements, and select a telescope with the largest
aperture possible.
Types of Telescopes
Refractor Telescope
A refractor telescope uses a lens as the primary. The lens at the front of the
telescope bends the light passing through it until it comes to a single point
called the “focal plane”.
The long, thin tubes of refractor telescopes look much the same as those Galileo
used centuries ago. High quality optical glass and multi-coatings provide today’s
sky watchers views Galileo never dreamed of. The refractor type of telescope is
very popular with individuals who want mechanical simplicity, rugged reliability
and ease of use. Because the focal length is limited by the length of the tube,
refractor telescopes become quite bulky and expensive beyond a four inch
aperture. This limits the light gathering properties of refractor telescopes, but it
is an excellent choice for beginners and those who prefer simple operation and
versatility. Refractor telescopes are also a popular choice because of their
unobstructed view, high contrast and good definition.
Refractor Advantages:
• Easy to set up and use
• Simple and reliable design
• Little or no maintenance
• Excellent for lunar, planetary and binary star observing especially in larger
apertures
• Good for terrestrial viewing
• High contrast images with no secondary mirror or diagonal obstruction
• Color correction is good in achromatic designs and excellent in apochromatic
and fluorite designs
• Sealed optical tube reduces image-degrading air currents and protects optics
• Objective lens is permanently mounted and aligned
Refractor Disadvantages
• More expensive per inch of aperture than Newtonians or Catadioptrics
• Heavier, longer and bulkier than equivalent aperture Newtonians and
Catadioptrics
The cost and size factors limit the practical maximum size primary to smaller
apertures
• Some color aberration in achromatic designs (doublet)
C8 • Moon • Image courtesy of Sebastian Voltmer
C8 • Moon • Image courtesy of Sebastian Voltmer