Network Virtualization using Extreme Fabric Connect
Table Of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Table of Figures
- Table of Figures
- Table of Tables
- Conventions
- Introduction
- Reference Architecture
- Guiding Principles
- Architecture Components
- User to Network Interface
- Network to Network Interface
- Backbone Core Bridge
- Backbone Edge Bridge
- Customer MAC Address
- Backbone MAC Address
- SMLT-Virtual-BMAC
- IS-IS Area
- IS-IS System ID
- IS-IS Overload Function
- SPB Bridge ID
- SPBM Nick-name
- Dynamic Nick-name Assignment
- Customer VLAN
- Backbone VLAN
- Virtual Services Networks
- I-SID
- Inter-VSN Routing
- Fabric Area Network
- Fabric Attach / Auto-Attach
- FA Server
- FA Client
- FA Proxy
- FA Standalone Proxy
- VPN Routing and Forwarding Instance
- Global Router Table
- Distributed Virtual Routing
- Zero Touch Fabric (ZTF)
- Foundations for the Service Enabled Fabric
- IP Routing and L3 Services over Fabric Connect
- L2 Services Over SPB IS-IS Core
- Fabric Attach
- IP Multicast Enabled VSNs
- Extending the Fabric Across the WAN
- Distributed Virtual Routing
- Quality of Service
- Consolidated Design Overview
- High Availability
- Fabric and VSN Security
- Fabric as Best Foundation for SDN
- Glossary
- Reference Documentation
- Revisions
Network Virtualization Using Extreme Fabric Connect
© 2019 Extreme Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. 15
configuration or identity-based networking authentication. These VLANs are associated with a VRF on the
BEB nodes where a given VLAN can belong to one and only one VRF. Multiple VRFs can be configured,
each belonging to a different Fabric wide service identifier (I-SID), thus providing multi-tenancy in L3 VSN.
Figure 3 Virtualization with SPB L3 VSNs
Tip
Benefits of SPB L3 VSNs over MPLS-VPNs are:
• Simple service definition via Service Identifier (I-SID) configuration on end-point
VRF instead of having to define multiple complex import and export BGP Route
Targets and BGP Route Descriptors.
• The same I-SID is also used in the Mac-in-Mac packet encapsulation, whereas with
MPLS-VPNs, the inner MPLS labels (used as VPN-id) only have an indirect
correlation to BGP Route Target configuration.
• No need for any BGP (and therefore no need for BGP Route Reflectors either).
• No need for MPLS (and therefore no need for an underlying IP IGP or LDP).
• No IP interfaces/subnets inside the Ethernet Fabric. IP interfaces exist only on
VLANs where end-stations connect; that is, IP interfaces only exist as gateways for
the VSN services they terminate.
• L3 VSNs can be IP Multicast enabled with one command per termination node (no
need for complex IETF Draft Rosen or Next-Gen MVPNs support).
• Sub-second convergence because SPB relies on a single link state routing protocol
(IS-IS), whereas MPLS is reliant on a BGP-LDP-OSPF protocol stack, which is
significantly slower to reconverge.
A comparison of the traditional designs used to deliver Layer 3 virtualization with the SPB architecture can
be found in Table 2.
Table 2 – SPB vs Traditional L3 Virtualization Technologies