Converged networks with Fibre Channel over Ethernet and Data Center Bridging
6
legacy FC ports. Examples of FCFs include HP Virtual Connect FlexFabric modules and HP Networking
5820X top-of-rack access switches with FC option modules.
FCoE has several advantages:
• Uses existing OS device drivers (Because the same vendors make devices used on CNAs and native FC
HBAs, they use a common FC/FCoE driver architecture.)
• Uses the existing Fibre Channel security and management model
• Makes storage targets that are provisioned and managed on a native FC SAN transparently accessible
through an FCoE FCF
However, there are also some challenges with FCoE:
• Must be deployed using a DCB-enabled Ethernet network
• Requires CNAs and new DCB-enabled Ethernet switches between the servers and FCFs (to accommodate
DCB)
• Is a non-routable protocol and used only within the data center. The same is true for native FC protocols
today.
• Requires an FCF device to connect the DCB network to the legacy FC SANs and storage
• Requires validating a new fabric infrastructure that converges LAN communications and FC traffic over
DCB-enabled Ethernet. Validating the network ensures that you have applied proper traffic class
parameters to meet your IT organizations’ business objectives and service level agreements.
Industry transition to converged fabrics
In one-hop architecture, converged traffic goes from a server to a switch that splits it to Ethernet and Fibre
Channel. In two-hop architecture, converged traffic goes to a second switch before the split. The more
switch hops there are in a DCB-enabled network, the more difficult it is to keep the network operating at
peak efficiency while minimizing congestion. Figure 5 shows the expected industry path to convergence.
Figure 5: The expected industry path to convergence leads to multi-hop architectures in 2013.