Implementing a Virtual Server Environment: Getting Started
Table Of Contents
- Chapter 1: Introduction
 - Chapter 2: Assessing and Planning
 - Chapter 3: Understanding the Choices for Virtualization Technologies 
- Partitioning Solutions:
 - Why choose nPartitions (nPars)?
 - Why choose Virtual Partitions (vPars)?
 - Why choose Integrity Virtual Machines (VMs)?
 - Why choose Resource Partitions or Secure Resource Partitions (SRPs)?
 - HP Utility Pricing Solutions:
 - Why choose Instant Capacity (iCAP)?
 - Why choose Temporary Instant Capacity (TiCAP)?
 - Why choose Global Instant Capacity (GiCAP)
 - Automation Solutions:
 - Why choose Global Workload Manager (gWLM) or Workload Manager (WLM)?
 
 - Chapter 4: HP VSE Reference Architectures
 - Chapter 5: Identifying a Pilot Project
 - Chapter 6: Making Your Choices
 - For more information
 
•  Integrity VMs and vPars cannot be used within the same nPar. 
•  Each Integrity VM currently limited to 8 cores. 
•  Hardware resources are shared, so not a good choice if dedicated hardware is required. 
•  Not supported on PA-RISC systems. 
•  There is a slight decrease in performance for I/O, so not the best choice for I/O-intensive 
applications. Note that newer releases of Integrity Virtual Machines deliver improved I/O 
performance using Accelerated Virtual I/O drivers that streamline and re-architect the I/O 
path for both networking and disk I/O. 
Sweet Spots 
•  Good choice for applications that do not need dedicated hardware (or an entire CPU) but do 
need OS isolation, different OS versions, different OS types, or a unique version of the 
application stack. 
•  Good choice for non-cell-based systems that need a partitioning solution (if they are not I/O 
intensive). 
•  Applications with spiky workloads can often get more than their entitlement of CPU cycles if 
the other virtual machines are not demanding those cycles. 
•  Easy for deploying a new application or a new instance of an existing application by 
creating a new virtual machine. 
Why choose Resource Partitions or Secure Resource Partitions (SRPs)? 
Key Benefits 
•  HP Process Resource Manager (PRM) product can be used to manage system resources (CPU, 
memory, and disk I/O bandwidth) according to a user-defined priority by placing processes 
in processor sets (PSETs) or Fair Share Scheduler (fss) groups. 
•  The granularity of resource allocation for PSETs is at the whole-CPU or core level. 
•  The granularity for resource allocation when using fss groups is sub-CPU (as little as 1%) 
•  Does not require a separate instance of the OS, as do vPars or Integrity VMs. 
•  Memory and I/O can be shared; memory entitlements can be reallocated on line. 
•  Supported on both HP 9000 and HP Integrity server systems; runs on both cell-based and 
non-cell-based systems. 
•  Can save significant amount of money on software licenses when application stacking by 
reducing the number of OS instances required. 
•  Workload Manager (WLM) can be used to add goal-based workload management and 
automation of iCAP resource usage. 
•  By using the Security Containment feature of HP-UX, you can place one or more secure 
compartments in PRM groups to create a Secure Resource Partition (SRP). Processes in each 
SRP are isolated and cannot communicate with or access the resources of processes in other 
SRPs. 
Trade-offs 
•  No hardware isolation (same as vPars and Integrity VMs). 
•   No OS isolation or flexibility because Resource Partitions or SRPs are in the same OS. 
•  Supported only on HP-UX. 
•  Requires same patch levels and kernel tunables because all partitions in the same OS. 
8 










