GPA Manual

Using GPA Information
Guardian Performance Analyzer (GPA) Manual135081
4-23
Expected System Performance After Tuning
Changes
Example 4-27. Expected System Performance After Tuning Changes for \NODEA
ESTIMATED PERFORMANCE PROFILE AFTER TUNING CHANGES
CPU PROCESSOR LOAD BALANCE CHART
NUM
--- ROUNDED TO NEAREST TWO PERCENT (2%)
|----+----+---wwww^wwww--+----+----+----+----+----|
0 |+++----------->M ^
1 |++++++-----------^------------->Q
2 |+++--------------^>
3 |++----> ^
|----+----+---wwww^wwww--+----+----+----+----+----|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
CPU PERCENT BUSY -------------------------------->
PROCESSOR PERFORMANCE CHART
CPU NUM : 0 1 2 3
CPU TYPE : TXP TXP TNSII TNSII
MB MEMORY: 8 8 8 8
PCT BUSY : 30.42 66.04 38.01 15.70
DISK PRIME : 4 0 5 0
DISK RATE : 11.9 6.8
CHIT RATE : 14.3 7.8
MSG RATE : 37 21 16 6
DISP RATE : 117.3 111.1 69.7 29.8
SWAP RATE : 1.26 .93 .17
MMGR PAGES : 1137 58 747 1305
PCB COUNT : 84 89 42 49
TRANSIENTS : 4 3 4
HALT IMPACT: MEMORY MEMORY MEMORY MEMORY
CPU Count: 4 Avg CPU Busy (^): 36.2 Tuning Window (w): 8
PCB Count: 264 Node SWAP Rate : 2.36 VOLUME Count : 9
CPU FLAG EXPLANATIONS: + - Interrupt Busy
M - Severe Memory Shortage m - Mild Memory Shortage
P - Severe Transient Processing p - Mild Transient Processing
B - Severe Transients/Memory Shortage b - Mild Transients/Mem. Shortage
Q - Moderate Memory Shortage R - Moderate Transient Processing
! - Processor MISSING From Measurement S - Moderate Transients/Mem. Short