Open System Services Porting Guide (G06.24+, H06.03+)
Table Of Contents
- What’s New in This Manual
- About This Manual
- 1 Introduction to Porting
- 2 The Development Environment
- 3 Useful Porting Tools
- 4 Interoperating Between User Environments
- Purpose of Interoperability
- The OSS User Environment
- OSS Commands for the Guardian User
- Guardian Commands for the UNIX User
- OSS Pathname and Guardian Filename Conversions
- Running the OSS Shell and Commands From TACL
- Running Guardian Commands From the OSS Shell
- Running OSS Processes With Guardian Attributes
- Using OSS Commands to Manage Guardian Objects
- 5 Interoperating Between Programming Environments
- 6 OSS Porting Considerations
- 7 Porting UNIX Applications to the OSS Environment
- 8 Migrating Guardian Applications to the OSS Environment
- General Migration Guidelines
- C Compiler Issues for Guardian Programs
- Using New and Extended Guardian Procedures
- Using OSS Functions in a Guardian Program
- Interoperating With OSS Programs
- Starting an OSS Program From the Guardian Environment
- C Compiler Considerations for OSS Programs
- Porting a Guardian Program to the OSS Environment
- How Arguments Are Passed to the C or C++ Program
- Differences in the Two Run-Time Environments
- Which Run-Time Routines Are Available
- Use of Common Run-Time Environment (CRE) Functions
- Replacing Guardian Procedure Calls With Equivalent OSS Functions
- Which IPC Mechanisms Can Be Used
- Interactions Between Guardian and OSS Functions
- 9 Porting From Specific UNIX Systems
- 10 Native Migration Overview
- 11 Porting or Migrating Sockets Applications
- 12 Porting Threaded Applications
- A Equivalent OSS and UNIX Commands for Guardian Users
- B Equivalent Guardian Commands for OSS and UNIX Users
- C Equivalent Inspect Debugging Commands for dbx Commands
- D Equivalent Native Inspect Debugging Commands for dbx Commands
- E Standard POSIX Threads Functions: Differences Between the Previous and Current Standards
- Glossary
- Index
Porting UNIX Applications to the OSS Environment
Open System Services Porting Guide—520573-006
7-6
Using Functional Equivalents
These practices are primarily applicable to new programs, but you may get an
opportunity to apply them when porting existing UNIX programs.
Using Functional Equivalents
The fewer nonstandard functions used by a program, the more portable it is. A
program becomes increasingly more difficult to port to multiple environments as it uses
functions in more of the categories in the order listed below:
•
ISO/ANSI C
•
POSIX.1
•
POSIX.2
•
XPG3
•
XPG4
•
XPG4 Version 2
•
Single UNIX Specification
•
HP extensions to OSS functions
•
HP extension OSS functions
•
Guardian functions
When a program uses nonstandard functions not in the set of functions included in
ISO/ANSI C, POSIX.1, or XPG4, functionally equivalent functions must be used when
porting the program to the OSS environment. The suggested list of functionally
equivalent functions listed in Table 7-1 can be used if the program uses one of the
nonstandard functions listed in the “Function” column.
The functions listed under “Function” in Table 7-1 are not currently provided in the OSS
environment. Therefore, they must be replaced by the functionally equivalent functions
(“Replacement Recommendation”).
Table 7-1. Functions Currently Not in the OSS Environment (page 1 of 2)
Function Replacement Recommendation
alloca() Use malloc() and free().
cabs() Use sqrt(x*x + y*y).
flock() Use fcntl().
getpw() Use getpwent().
gettimeofday() Use localtime() and time().
killpg() Use kill() with a negative process group ID.
lchown() Do not use.
lockf() Use fcntl().
mmap(), munmap() Recode in ISO/ANSI C.
poll() Use Guardian sockets with nowait I/O.
scandir() Use readdir(), malloc(), and qsort().
setbuffer() Use setvbuf().