Intel Celeron D Processor 300 Sequence on 90 nm Process

Errata
Specification Update 55
Implication: In IA-32e mode, under the conditions given above, an IRET can get an AC# even if
alignment checks are disabled at the start of the IRET. This erratum can only be
observed with a software generated stack frame.
Workaround: Software should not generate misaligned stack frames for use with IRET.
Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.
L78. Using 2M/4M Pages When A20M# Is Asserted May Result in
Incorrect Address Translations
Problem: An external A20M# pin if enabled forces address bit 20 to be masked (forced to zero)
to emulates real-address mode address wraparound at 1 megabyte. However, if all of
the following conditions are met, address bit 20 may not be masked:
paging is enabled
a linear address has bit 20 set
the address references a large page
A20M# is enabled
Implication: When A20M# is enabled and an address references a large page the resulting
translated physical address may be incorrect. This erratum has not been observed
with any commercially available operating system.
Workaround: Operating systems should not allow A20M# to be enabled if the masking of
address bit 20 could be applied to an address that references a large page. A20M# is
normally only used with the first megabyte of memory.
Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.
L79. Writing Shared Unaligned Data that Crosses a Cache Line without
Proper Semaphores or Barriers May Expose a Memory Ordering Issue
Problem: Software which is written so that multiple agents can modify the same shared
unaligned memory location at the same time may experience a memory ordering
issue if multiple loads access this shared data shortly thereafter. Exposure to this
problem requires the use of a data write which spans a cache line boundary.