Instruction manual

Q & A with Laurence
79Understanding your X-TERRA - Technology
Dr. Laurence Statmatescu is the inventor of VFLEX technology. He
worked as a nuclear physicist in a nuclear research institute in Romania,
then moved to Australia in 1992.
Laurence completed a PhD in Optics (lasers) gaining experience in
electronics and signal processing. He joined Minelabs engineering team
in 1996, with the XT 18000 (the predecessor of the Eureka Gold) being
his rst project.
VFLEX technology was Laurences own design that he started at home as a ‘spare time’ project. He is a Senior
Technical Manager in Minelabs engineering team and responsible for the research and development of new
metel detection tetechnologies.

Q
A


Is there a correlation between target properties when comparing the negative
TID numbers (ferrous targets) while using the Coin & Treasure Mode and the
Iron Mask numbers while using the Prospecting Mode? Are the Iron Mask
settings an extension of the Coin & Treasure Modes ferrous discrimination scale,
but on a more rened level?
The short answer is no. The long answer is as follows.
TID and Iron Mask have somewhat dierent purposes: TID aims at giving
each target the best ID, while Iron Mask aims at separating the ferrous and
non-ferrous targets in conditions of high mineralization. Ferrous/non-ferrous
discrimination is dicult in high mineralization conditions, where in fact
most of the gold nuggets are. Thus, the Iron Mask feature gives the user a
way to adjust where the compromise lies. In other words, the user can choose
anywhere between two extremes:
1. “I am prepared to dig each detected target, because I do not want to miss any nuggets”- In this case I
set the Iron Mask at minimum (0, All metal).
2. “I do not want to dig ferrous junk, even if I might miss some nuggets”- In this case I set the Iron Mask
at maximum (20).
Ferrous targets
Gold targets
Iron Mask adjustment
0
20
As the mineralization makes identication harder the Iron Mask sets the boundary between what it
believes to be a good or a bad target, based on both the user preference and the measurements of the
ground interference.