User manual
5 Power quality - a guide
73
5.3.7 Power Factor
True Power Factor or Power Factor (TPF or PF) is the value which takes into account also the
presence of higher harmonics. For sinusoidal circuits, it is equal to Displacement Power Factor
(DPF) i.e. popular cos.
DPF is therefore a measure of the phase shift between the fundamental voltage and current
components. Power Factor is the ratio between active and apparent powers:
In case of a purely resistive load (in a one-phase system), the apparent power is equal to active
power (in terms of value), and reactive power equals zero, so such load fully uses the energy po-
tential of the source and the power factor is 1. Appearance of reactive component inevitably leads
to reduction of energy transmission effectiveness – the active power is then less than apparent
power, and the reactive power is increasing.
In three-phase systems, the power factor reduction is also influenced by receiver unbalance
(see discussion on reactive power). In such systems, correct power factor value is obtained using
the effective apparent power S
e
, that is the value defined, among others, in IEEE 1459-2000 stand-
ard.
5.4 Harmonics
Dividing periodic signal into harmonic components is a very popular mathematical operation
based on Fourier’s theorem which says that any periodic signal can be represented as a sum of
sinusoidal components with frequencies equal to multiples of fundamental frequency of such signal.
Time-domain signal can be subjected to Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to receive amplitudes and
phases of harmonic components in the frequency domain.
In a perfect situation, voltage is generated in a generator which at output gives a pure sinusoidal
50/60 Hz waveform (absence of any higher harmonics). If the receiver is a linear system, then also
current in such situation is a pure sinusoidal waveform. In real systems, voltage and current wave-
forms can be distorted, hence in addition to the fundamental component there must be harmonics
of higher orders.
Why is the presence of higher harmonics in the network undesirable?
One of the reasons is the skin effect which involves pushing out the electrons from the centre of
conductor towards the surface as the current frequency is increasing. As a result, the higher the
frequency, the smaller the effective conductor cross section which is available for the electrons,
which means that the conductor resistance is increasing. Consequently, the higher the current
harmonics, the higher effective cabling resistance for this harmonics, and this inevitably leads to
more power losses and heating of conductors.
A classic example connected with this effect is related to neutral conductor in three-phase sys-
tems. In a system with little distortion, little unbalance and a balanced (or slightly unbalanced) re-
ceiver, the current in neutral conductor has the tendency of zeroing (it is much smaller that RMS
phase currents). Such observation has tempted many designers to obtains savings by installing the
cabling in such systems with neutral conductor of a smaller cross section than in phase conductors.
And everything went well until the appearance of odd harmonic orders which are multiples of 3
(third, ninth, etc.). Suddenly, the neutral conductor began overheating and the measurement
showed very high RMS current. Explanation of this phenomenon is quite simple. In this example,
the designer did not take into consideration two circumstances: in systems with distorted wave-
forms, the higher harmonics might not zero in the neutral conductor, and quite to the contrary, they
may sum up, and secondly, the skin effect and high harmonic currents additionally contributed to
the neutral conductor heating.