FSC Forest Certification

Forest Management & Stump-to-Forest Gate Chain-of-Custody Certification Evaluation Report | PUBLIC
Version 7-0 (December 2016) | © SCS Global Services
Page 30 of 46
(Law #12.651/12). Furthermore,
there is a forestry recovery project in
place which is meant to eliminate
exotic species from permanent
preservation areas.
Chain of custody
Everyone who is involved in the
forest management chain-of-custody
is aware of the procedures and
controls that are required to assure
the products traceability.
None
Group Management
NA
NA
4.2 Process of Determining Conformance
4.2.1 Structure of Standard and Degrees of Nonconformance
FSC-accredited forest stewardship standards consist of a three-level hierarchy: principle, the criteria that
correspond to that principle, and the performance indicators that elaborate each criterion. Consistent
with SCS Forest Conservation Program evaluation protocols, the team collectively determines whether
or not the subject forest management operation is in conformance with every applicable indicator of the
relevant forest stewardship standard. Each nonconformance must be evaluated to determine whether
it constitutes a major or minor nonconformance at the level of the associated criterion or sub-criterion.
Not all indicators are equally important, and there is no simple numerical formula to determine whether
an operation is in nonconformance. The team therefore must use their collective judgment to assess
each criterion and determine if the FME is in conformance. If the FME is determined to be in
nonconformance at the criterion level, then at least one of the applicable indicators must be in major
nonconformance.
Corrective action requests (CARs) are issued for every instance of a nonconformance. Major
nonconformances trigger Major CARs and minor nonconformances trigger Minor CARs.
4.2.1 Interpretations of Major CARs, Minor CARs and Observations
Major CARs: Major nonconformances, either alone or in combination with nonconformances of all other
applicable indicators, result (or are likely to result) in a fundamental failure to achieve the objectives of
the relevant FSC Criterion given the uniqueness and fragility of each forest resource. These are
corrective actions that must be resolved or closed out before a certificate can be awarded. If Major
CARs arise after an operation is certified, the timeframe for correcting these nonconformances is
typically shorter than for Minor CARs. Certification is contingent on the certified FME’s response to the
CAR within the stipulated time frame.
Minor CARs: These are corrective action requests in response to minor nonconformances, which are
typically limited in scale or can be characterized as an unusual lapse in the system. Most Minor CARs are