FSC Forest Certification

Forest Management & Stump-to-Forest Gate Chain-of-Custody Certification Evaluation Report | PUBLIC
Version 7-0 (December 2016) | © SCS Global Services
Page 32 of 46
FME response
(including any
evidence submitted)
The incident that was reported during the assessment was analyzed and it was
concluded that the procedures were not being fully implemented despite the
guidance program that is provided to the cooperators throughout the year. In the
light of this, monitoring has been intensified. This so-called cage attitude is strictly
forbidden in the FMU and they will no longer be allowed during the operation. The
number of monitoring and field inspections that had been undertaken can be
checked during the audit.
SCS review
The field inspections have been intensified to check the tree logging activities and
the results of the evaluations are registered in a specific checklist. The checklist
includes items to assess safe manual logging techniques without employing the
method in series (telephone effect). The records show that the practice of logging
trees in series is no longer employed. The assessment team realized in the field
that the chainsaw operators are aware of the safe tree logging techniques and
conscious about the internal safety rules that are to be followed to implement this
activity. Moreover, they reported that logging trees in series is forbidden. In the
light of the above, the unconformity has been closed.
Status of CAR:
Closed
Upgraded to Major
Other decision (refer to description above)
Finding Number: 02/16
Select one: Major CAR Minor CAR Observation
FMU CAR/OBS issued to (when more than one FMU):
Deadline
Pre-condition to certification/recertification
3 months from Issuance of Final Report
12 months or next audit (surveillance or re-evaluation)
Observation response is optional
Other deadline (specify):
FSC Indicator:
4.2.11
Non-Conformity (or Background/ Justification in the case of Observations):
Wearing of PPEs is duly monitored by the organization.
The assessors interviewed managers and cooperators, audited paperwork and carried out field
inspections and it was realized that individual protection equipments (PPEs) are made available free of
charge to the cooperators. Moreover, the PPEs are in adequate conditions and are appropriate to the
tasks and equipments that are employed. On the other hand, some monitoring gaps and some
equipments incorrectness were observed during the field inspections. The following gaps were observed
in the field in distinct work fronts:
(a) Two cooperators who were engaged in the application of formicide were not wearing their
uniform T-shirts underneath the PPE overall;
(b) Chainsaw operators and their harvesting helpers and the cooperators who were implementing
pruning were not wearing safety goggles;
(c) A machine operator, backed by the trees fastening for the tractor skidding was not wearing his
gloves while he was handling the steel cable to tie them; and
(d) The field foreman was not wearing the gaiters to come into the stand.
X
X
X